In-depth reviews guided by a Pediatrician

BubbleBum Review

Acceptable performance for a travel friendly, inexpensive choice
Top Pick Award
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Price:   $30 List | $27 at Amazon
Pros:  Lightweight and portable, budget-friendly
Cons:  Harder to use, lower quality
Manufacturer:   BubbleBum
By Juliet Spurrier, MD & Wendy Schmitz  ⋅  Oct 18, 2017
  • Share this article:
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more
51
OVERALL
SCORE


RANKED
#8 of 9
  • Crash Test - 35% 5
  • Ease Of Use - 30% 4
  • Weight/Size - 15% 9
  • Comfort - 10% 5
  • Quality - 10% 3

The Skinny

The BubbleBum booster seat is an inflatable cushion that boosts children up, so the vehicle seatbelt properly aligns with their body for safe fitting. This product is small and very lightweight making it ideal for carpool and travel, or instances where children may need to carry their booster. While this product has some inherent issues, like the use of lower quality materials and some difficulty with seat belt retainers, we still think it is the best thing going for times when you may need to carry or transport a booster seat for driving safety. With the lowest price in the group, this easy to buckle option makes a great add-on safety option for use when your full-size booster would be too cumbersome or heavy for the job at hand.


Compare to Similar Products

Our Analysis and Test Results

BubbleBum is the first inflatable booster seat and was invented by Grainne Kelly. Kelly came up with the BubbleBum idea when she got frustrated carrying around heavy and bulky boosters for her two children. This booster meets and exceeds EU and US requirements. This innovation is the flagship product for a company that now makes a children's neck pillow and activity organizer for the backseat. The BubbleBum sells in more than twenty-eight countries.

Performance Comparison



The BubbleBum earned basic crash test results that are neither ultra-impressive nor the worst in the group. They are superior to those earned by the mifold  the only other backless booster we tested.
The BubbleBum earned basic crash test results that are neither ultra-impressive nor the worst in the group. They are superior to those earned by the mifold, the only other backless booster we tested.

Crash Test


The BubbleBum earned a below-average crash test score for the group.


All of the boosters included in this review have passed the Federal minimum guidelines for safety and are therefore considered safe. The testing of the boosters in thie=s review allows for an apples-to-apples comparison of results using the same standards and facility that NHTSA uses in their testing. The BubbleBumprovides what we consider to be a basic level of protection with test results that were generally average for the group.

The graph shows a comparison of the head sensor (HIC results for the BubbleBum (in black) compared to the best results in the group earned by the Evenflo Spectrum (in green).
The graph shows a comparison of the head sensor (HIC results for the BubbleBum (in black) compared to the best results in the group earned by the Evenflo Spectrum (in green).

This booster's head sensor on the crash test dummy registered 603 where the maximum HIC allowed is 1000 ( the lower result is better). While this is below the maximum, it is higher than the top performer with results of 456.

The graph shows a comparison of the chest sensor (g) crash test results for the BubbleBum (in black) compared to the best results in the group earned by the Peg Perego Viaggio Flex (in green).
The graph shows a comparison of the chest sensor (g) crash test results for the BubbleBum (in black) compared to the best results in the group earned by the Peg Perego Viaggio Flex (in green).

The chest sensor results (g) on the BubbleBum crash test dummy showed 45 g where the maximum allowed is 60 g and a lower result is better. The lowest (and best) result in our tests is 39 g (see comparison above).

Backless vs High-backed
In general, we feel a high-backed booster provides an added degree of safety by creating a shell similar to convertible car seats for possible side-impact collisions or vehicle intrusion from the outside during a crash. However, that being said, we feel any safety belt-positioning device is better than none and the BubbleBum fills a niche where boosters are often skipped for the sake of convenience. This is why this product earned a Top Pick for travel and carpooling.

It is easier for children to buckle themselves in with the BubbleBum  but the belt often fell out of the retainer prior to buckling which isn't ideal.
It is easier for children to buckle themselves in with the BubbleBum, but the belt often fell out of the retainer prior to buckling which isn't ideal.

Ease of Use


Given the BubbleBum lack of features or back, the lower ease of use score is somehow even more disappointing.


Our kid testers were able to buckle themselves in easier with this product than the similarly small competitors.

Parents may need to help little ones attach the BubbleBum shoulder retainer to the vehicle belt depending on their age and abilities.
The shoulder retainer on the BubbleBum needs more attention than high backed boosters to ensure it stays in the right location.

However, the belt strap fell out of the retainer regularly and they struggled more with the shoulder retainer and keeping it in the right spot for proper alignment (above left). Unlike the high back boosters, this kind of booster needs more attention (above right) to the retainer location as it can move.

Installation and moving the BubbleBum is fairly easy. It has no LATCH and is so lightweight kids can move and adjust the booster themselves. The seat is spot clean only and it does have a crevice that wraps around the entire product where gunk can and will get lodged.

The BubbleBum is only 1 lb and 14 inches wide. These measurements make it the lightest and second smallest option in the review. You can deflate the booster and roll it up smaller to fit in the carry bag.
The BubbleBum is only 1 lb and 14 inches wide. These measurements make it the lightest and second smallest option in the review. You can deflate the booster and roll it up smaller to fit in the carry bag.

Weight and Size


The BubbleBum is one of the smallest and lightest options in the group.


This product has the lightest weight in the group at only 1 lb. Even the smaller competitor is heavier with a weight of 1.5 lbs. The BubbleBum is 14 in wide, making it the second-smallest. It is highly likely you can fit up to three of the BubbleBum boosters across the back seat of most vehicles given the smaller width. This makes them a great choice for carpooling as it enables the transport of more children than traditional high-backed boosters.

Little testers had no complaints concerning comfort for the BubbleBum including the shoulder belt retainer or strap.
Little testers had no complaints concerning comfort for the BubbleBum including the shoulder belt retainer or strap.

Comfort


This booster isn't as comfortable. as some of the competition with high backs.


However, our little testers all felt that this seat was comfortable for what it is and gave it fairly high ratings compared to the competition. They felt the air-filled base was comfortable and had no real complaints. For us, the fabric is not as soft as it looks and isn't that friendly on bare legs. It also lost points, however, for not having a back or headrest which can increase napping capabilities.

We feel the quality of the BubbleBum could improve by preventing the cushion from deflating on its own and increasing the softness and durability of the fabric.
We feel the quality of the BubbleBum could improve by preventing the cushion from deflating on its own and increasing the softness and durability of the fabric.

Quality


This booster isn't the best quality compared to the competition.


The padding is an air cushion, and overtime, the cushion struggles to stay inflated indicating a loss of air pressure somewhere and a quality assurance issue. The fabric isn't as nice as it could be and the design of the seat means it will easily collect grime and the fabric may not wear well over time. The Overall fit and finish are somewhat cheap and sloppy. Even though the product is inexpensive, the simple design could have been executed with higher-end materials and more attention to quality control.

Manufacturer Video




Juliet Spurrier, MD & Wendy Schmitz