In-depth reviews guided by a Pediatrician

Maclaren Mark II Review

Hard to push and turn stroller with poor nap-ability and difficult to use harness and fold
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Price:   $200 List | $200 at Amazon
Pros:  Easy to carry, light weight
Cons:  Poor maneuverability, long harness straps, hard to use buckle
Manufacturer:   Maclaren
By Juliet Spurrier, MD & BabyGearLab Team  ⋅  Mar 24, 2019
  • Share this article:
Our Editors independently research, test, and rate the best products. We only make money if you purchase a product through our links, and we never accept free products from manufacturers. Learn more
52
OVERALL
SCORE

RANKED
#11 of 19
  • Weight/Folded Size - 35% 8
  • Ease Of Use - 30% 4
  • Maneuverability - 25% 3
  • Quality - 10% 4

The Skinny

The Maclaren Mark II scored higher than the more expensive Maclaren Techno XT. This minimal stroller earned a top score for weight and folded size with the lowest weight in the group of 8.6 lbs. Unfortunately, it failed to impress in any of our other tests with low scores for ease of use and quality, and next to the lowest score for maneuverability. The Mark is difficult to push and turn with almost no recline and a difficult harness and fold; it can't match the other products in its price range that offer more features and better functionality. The Zoe XL1 Best v2 earned more points overall, has the same list price, and a better score for ease of use. By comparison, the Mark II a stroller we have trouble recommending.


Compare to Similar Products

(change comparison)
 
This Product
Maclaren Mark II
Awards  Editors' Choice Award Best Value Award Top Pick Award  
Price $200.00 List
$200.00 at Amazon		$500.00 List
$499.00 at Amazon		$230.00 List
$174.95 at Amazon - 24% off		$260.00 List
$279.99 at Amazon		$230.00 List
$203.99 at Amazon - 11% off
Overall Score Sort Icon
100
0
52
100
0
71
100
0
65
100
0
63
100
0
60
Star Rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Pros Easy to carry, light weightEasy to push and turn, nice quality, lightweightLightweight, giant canopy, priceEasy to use, cozy napping, Car seat compatibleEasy to use and push, useful features, quick fold
Cons Poor maneuverability, long harness straps, hard to use buckleExpensive, not the best napperLower quality, poor off-road capabilitiesHeavier than umbrella options, hard to carryHeavier and larger
Bottom Line Harder to maneuver with a difficult to operate buckle and foldStylish, lightweight, easy mover, that folds small but has a higher priceLightweight with good features and price but it could be smaller or easier to push off-roadEasy to use and push stroller but it is heavier for a lightweight optionWeight and size could make it a poor traveler but features are convenient
Rating Categories Maclaren Mark II BabyZen Yoyo+ ZOE XL1 BEST v2 Baby Jogger City... Britax B-Lively
Weight Folded Size (35%)
10
0
8
10
0
7
10
0
7
10
0
3
10
0
3
Ease Of Use (30%)
10
0
4
10
0
6
10
0
8
10
0
8
10
0
8
Maneuverability (25%)
10
0
3
10
0
8
10
0
5
10
0
8
10
0
7
Quality (10%)
10
0
4
10
0
8
10
0
4
10
0
8
10
0
8
Specs Maclaren Mark II BabyZen Yoyo+ ZOE XL1 BEST v2 Baby Jogger City... Britax B-Lively
Weight 8.6 lbs 13.5 lbs 11.8 lbs 17.5 lbs 18.9 lbs
Folded Dimensions 11.7"W x 10.4"H x 45.5"L 17.5"W x 9"H x 20.8"L 21.3"W x 9.5"H x 27.4"L 24.1"W x 10.5"H x 32.8"L 24"W x 9.5"H x 29"L
Capacity Limits Minimum: 6 months
Maximum: 55 lbs/43"		 Minimum: 6 months
Maximum: 40 lbs		 Minimum: 3 months
Maximum: 40 lbs		 Minimum: Birth
Maximum: 50 lbs/44"		 Minimum: Birth
Maximum: 55 lbs/44"
Included Car Seat Compatibility None None None None Britax All Britax Seats
Click-in Car Seat Adapters None Cybex
Aton Q
Nuna
Pipa
Maxi-Cosi
Mico AP		 None Britax
B-Safe, B-Safe 35, B-Safe 35 Elite
BOB
B-Safe		 Britax All Britax Seats
Strap-in Car Seat Adapters None None None Baby Jogger
City GO
Graco
SnugRide Click Connect 30, 35, 35 LX, 40
Peg Perego
Primo Viaggio 4-35, Primo Viaggio SIP 30/30
Chicco
KeyFit, KeyFit 30
Cybex
Aton, Aton 3S, Aton Q
Maxi Cosi
Mico AP, Mico Max 30		 None
One-handed Fold Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Locking Fold Auto Auto Auto Auto Auto
Self-standing Fold No Yes Yes No No
Carry Strap Yes Yes No No No
Handlebar Height - Min/Max 40.5" 39.8" 39.7" 41.6" 40"
Sandal-friendly Brake Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Included Accessories Wind-Resistant Raincover Rain Shield None None None
Setup Time 3:07 13:20 2:49 4:29 5:04

Our Analysis and Test Results

The Maclaren Mark II is the lightest stroller in the review at 8.6 lbs; however this lighter weight wasn't enough to earn it a higher rank due to poor performance in some key metrics.
The Maclaren Mark II is the lightest stroller in the review at 8.6 lbs; however, this lighter weight wasn't enough to earn it a higher rank due to poor performance in some key metrics.
Owen Finlay Maclaren started Maclaren in England in 1965. As test pilot and aviation engineer Owen wanted to create a lightweight stroller with an easy fold that was small when folded for travel. Mclaren took inspiration from airplane landing gear to develop the first folding stroller. The Maclaren collapsed in on itself much like an umbrella, creating the first umbrella stroller. Maclaren's patented design remains essentially unchanged and he was honored as a Member of the British Empire for his invention by the Queen herself.

Performance Comparison


The chart below shows how the Maclaren Mark II (shown in blue) ranked when compared to the competition.


The details related to performance during testing are provided in the sections below divided by metrics.

The Mark II has a nice shoulder carry strap that leaves you hands free but it isn't as comfortable as the one on the Quinny Yezz.
The Mark II has a nice shoulder carry strap that leaves you hands free, but it isn't as comfortable as the one on the Quinny Yezz.

Weight and Folded Size


The Mark II earned an 8 of 10 for weight and folded size, with a weight of 8.6 lbs. While it is the lightest option, it is not the smallest, measuring 5,536.44 cubic inches when folded. Alternatively, the similar Inglesina Net, weighs 11.9 lbs and measures 4,762.80 cubic inches. Depending on your needs, smaller might be more important than the 3 lb difference. This stroller has a nice shoulder carry strap.

Ease of Use


The Mark earned a 4 of 10 for ease of use, while the Zoe XL1 Best v2 earned the high of 8 and offered a deeper recline, better storage, and the easiest fold, with the same price.

The Maclaren Mark II is the lightest but not the smallest folded product.
The Maclaren Mark II is the lightest, but not the smallest folded product.

Fold and Unfold


The Mark II has Maclaren's one-handed collapsable umbrella fold. The fold is initiated using feet and locks closed automatically, but it does not self-stand.

Brakes


The Mark has double action brakes that require two pedals to set. These brakes are easy to set, release, and use wearing sandals.

The Mark II has odd access to storage with a high back and side cross bar.
The Mark II has odd access to storage with a high back and side cross bar.

Storage


The bin on the Mark II holds up to 4.4 lbs maximum and fit our small diaper bag. Accessing the bin is a bit of a joke with a weird shape that has a high back with side access obscured with bars. There is no additional storage on this stroller.

The Mark II sun shade has a kick out visor and is UPF 50+.
The Mark II peek-a-boo window does not have a cover but it is relatively small and tinted with cross hatching to help protect baby from direct sunlight.

Sunshade


The Mark II canopy is medium in size and has UPF 50+. It features a kick out visor (above left) and a square peek-a-boo window that is cross-hatched vinyl (above right). The window has no cover and is hard to see through, but at least it doesn't leave baby exposed to direct sunlight.

While the Mark II harness is easier to use than the Maclaren Techno it still is stiff and the shoulder straps are too long to secure smaller children in the seat.
While the Mark II harness is easier to use than the Maclaren Techno, it still is stiff and the shoulder straps are too long to secure smaller children in the seat.

Harness


The Mark II harness is difficult to operate. This harness has easy rethreaded height adjustment, but changing the length of the straps is difficult because you need to feed the strap through each piece twice. The buckle is a nesting buckle that requires partial assembly before inserting the straps.

The Mark II seat back reclines by unzipping the sides. The recline is minimal and will not allow baby to nap comfortably.
The Mark II seat back reclines by unzipping the sides. The recline is minimal and will not allow baby to nap comfortably.

Seat


The seat on the Mark is similar to the Inglesina Net and just as disappointing. The seat back is made of mesh and reclines about 2-3 inches by unzipping the sides. Baby is unlikely to even notice the new angle and it certainly isn't napping worthy. The Mark II doesn't offer a leg rest and the small footrest is unreachable by smaller children

.

Ease of Setup


The Mark II is easy to assemble taking us about 3:00 minutes. It doesn't require any tools, and there are no canopy instructions, but it isn't difficult to figure out.



Maneuverability


The Mark II earned a 3 of 10 for maneuverability, making it one of the more difficult strollers to push. Alternatively, the Zoe XL1 Best v2 earned a 5 and is easier to navigate. This stroller has small plastic wheels with the dual wheel design. Pushing the Mark is uncomfortable with solid plastic handles. Navigation is difficult and the stroller flexes when you try to make tight turns leaving it feeling unresponsive and sloppy. Moving to uneven surfaces makes the job even harder with the wheels getting stuck and refusing to move in the direction you choose, as they are pulled off course by any small bump or groove. It is not a good option for terrains you might encounter at a play park.

The small dual front wheels on the Mark II cause it to veer off course while pushing on uneven surfaces like grass or gravel.
The small dual front wheels on the Mark II cause it to veer off course while pushing on uneven surfaces like grass or gravel.

The Mark has lackluster all-wheel suspension and no padding on the seat. It is unlikely that this stroller is comfortable, as the mesh seat has no padding, no leg rest, and does not recline enough for napping.

Quality


The Mark II earned a 4 of 10 for quality, compared to the Inglesina Net score of 6. The overall look and feel of the Mark II are disappointing with exposed rivets and connection points. This stroller has plastic wheels and flimsy feeling fabric with no seat padding or useable storage. The handles are uncovered plastic with rough edges that rub on skin and while it gets the job done, for the price it feels like it should do it with nicer fabric or a more streamlined frame.

Manufacturer Video




— Juliet Spurrier, MD & BabyGearLab Team