We took these strollers through the city and parks to see how they compared to one another in day-to-day ordinary use. The hands-on testing gave us lots of information about each product and how well they perform in real-world scenarios. Some of the products looked good on paper but failed to impress on the road. Others were beautiful or innovative but seemed clunky or difficult to use. Also, to be thorough, we performed a series of controlled tests in our lab to test and compare specific performance elements in a side-by-side manner.
In the end, we defined specific tests to look at key performance metrics. These ranged from the ease of using the safety harness to pushing products across the grass, gravel, dirt, and even curbs. This gave us the information we needed to rate the products based on a combination of actual use and detailed analysis instead of speculation and manufacturer specifications.
Testing Weight and Folded Size
Weight and folded size were determined by taking our own measurements of the products instead of relying on manufacturer specs. This way, we could ensure that all the products were rated equally against each other using the same scale for weight and the same measuring methods. Products were weighed using a fully assembled stroller with all the parts and measured with the same measuring device by the same person. The weights and measurements were then compared against each other to determine scores. The smaller and lighter strollers earned higher scores in this metric.
Testing Ease of Use
We reviewed and compared some of the features and convenience items included with each product for ease of use. The strollers earned points for ample sun shades, peek-a-boo windows, cup holders, storage bins, harnesses, adjustable leg rests, and reclining back pads.
Some products didn't offer much in this category, while others had all the bells and whistles. The products were compared to each other, and we looked at which had the largest storage options and the biggest canopies, which had convenient, easy to use storage, and which bins were blocked with awkwardly placed stabilizing crossbars. Strollers were rated against one another so users can get a good idea of how they compare instead of what they offer. Things like how far back the recline feature went and a leg rest adjustment helped differentiate between models and widen the gap in their scores.
We put each product through a series of strolling tests on different surfaces and environments to assess their agility and maneuverability under normal circumstances as well as under duress. We pushed them two-handed and one-handed over flat concrete and hardwood, grass and gravel, and up curbs to determine which products had the mettle where it mattered with wheels on the ground. The important part of being a product in this category is maneuvering well in tight spaces and crowded locations. Hard surface ease is a must, but moving on various terrains is a bonus worth considering. We rated the products against each other for which did the best on each surface. The strollers that were easiest to push or turn earned higher scores. Those that did well on different surfaces also scored higher. Those that struggled with turns or had trouble with transitions scored lower.
Quality was determined by our general overall experience with each product and how they compared to each other. We looked at items like fabric weave, stain or water repellent properties, our ability to cause snags, and how well the stitching was performed, and it was fitted to the frame nicely. We considered frame materials, connection points, and whether or not the frame flexed under pressure or handlebars that seemed burdened by their job. The wheels were also reviewed, and we looked for wheels that were made with quality materials that had worn well through our tests and review period. Quality scores were given by comparing strollers to each other and how well the products held up.